"Don't you believe it"
Views: 1
OK, so the classic Rubik’s Cube wasn’t particularly difficult once you knew the patterns. Rubik’s Revenge (A 4×4 cube) was significantly harder. But I have no idea what to make of this:
If that weren’t brain-twisting enough, how about a Rubik’s Cube with five dimensions? And three people have actually solved it – I can only imagine what kind of mutants they are.
Views: 1
I really was in Bulgaria – honest!
Views: 3
After four years of using Blogger, it’s time for a change. I’ve switched over to WordPress, since I can host the entire thing on my website, and it’s far more customizable (I particularly like the Categories feature). So now the new address is 3nv7.com – the old address will still get you here as well.
Views: 3
In my previous post I referenced a link to the New York Times, which reminded me of the fact that I was actually interviewed by them several years ago for an article on retro-computing. The article is still on their website, and the article is still wrong. Quoting the relevant part:
In the early days, programmers looked for creative software solutions instead of glitzier hardware. ”In a way it was simpler back then,” said Lane Denson, a Nashville farmer who has set up a computer museum in his basement. ”You didn’t have 20 or 30 sound cards and you didn’t have to worry about upgrading every other week.”
…except for the fact that I’ve never been a farmer, and I don’t have a basement, nor a computer museum (Well, Emily might debate that last point). I contacted the writer at the time and she said she’d publish a correction, but it never happened. And they didn’t even bother to publish a link to my Commodore 64 website, which is how they got my name in the first place. Oh well – it’s not every day you’re quoted in one of the world’s largest newspapers.
Here’s the link to the full article (may require registration): Living the 8-bit Dream in a 32-bit World