…wherein I complain about the people at the YMCA

Views: 2

I’ve been a member at the YMCA for several years. While most people there are nice, normal folk, I’ve noticed that there are some who annoy everyone else through their behavior. These people generally fall into one of a few different categories:

1. The Jerk

The Jerk is generally an older male. He “jerks” his way through all the exercises, completely oblivious to the fact that when your back does all the work, you not only risk injuring yourself, but the muscle groups that *should* be affected are barely coming into play

2. The Lounger

The Lounger is there to socialize. He/she talks excessively loud to those around them, or (God forbid) takes up space on a treadmill or stair machine while talking on a cell phone. They are more interested in the game on TV, thinks the exercise equipment are suitable replacements for a chair or couch, and are generally oblivious to those around them who are actually there to *work* during their workout.

3. The Exhibitionist

The Exhibitionist is almost always female, usually in high school. They wear very little clothing, and what they do wear is about two sizes too small. They spend a good hour and a half on the different aerobic machines (treadmill/elliptical/bike) going full speed, despite the fact that they probably have 5% body fat as it is. Kind of sad to see a eating disorder in training.

4. The Newbie

The Newbie is, as the name suggests, new. Usually out of shape. Which isn’t a problem – everyone has to start somewhere. But the Newbie tends to wander around from station to station, generally doing exercises wrong/ineffectively. Which is easily corrected with a simple equipment orientation – if they would only take advantage of it.

5. The Snob

The Snob is a gym regular…. the weights are *his* domain, and woe unto those who interferes in his workout. He thinks everyone else should get out of his way, and not dare use a piece of equipment that he might need somewhere down the road.

In other words, me 🙂

“It’s about Love”

Views: 5

With regards to homosexual “marriage”, specifically as it relates to Christianity: I’ve often heard the sentiment expressed that Jesus preached love – and that should be the over-riding concern in all matters – as the justification for homosexual unions/marriages/covenants. However you want to dress it up, you simply cannot use “it’s about love” as an excuse:

  • What if I want to “love” my pet?
  • What if I want to “love” my daughter?
  • What if I want to “love” a dead person?
  • What if I want to “love” multiple women?
  • What if I want to “love” an infant?

Most people who support homosexual unions and call themselves Christians would say that’s ridiculous – those situations are *obviously* sinful.

That’s exactly what they would’ve said about homosexuality 50 years ago.

What’s changed? God hasn’t changed. The Bible hasn’t changed. Society has changed, and too many Christians are caught up in what the secular world is telling them, rather than what God has told us for thousands of years.

“Oh, but we were ignorant then. We’re more enlightened now.”

NAMBLA (North American Man-Boy Love Association) would have you become even more “enlightened”. If you think the secular world is going to stop with homosexual marriages, you are sadly mistaken. Not only will the so-called “progressives” attempt to expand the boundaries of what can be called “marriage”, they will attempt to criminalize those who continue to stand on the position that marriage should only apply to one man and one woman. They’re already trying to take God out of everything else – the church won’t be far behind.

Moral relativism is going to continue to be pushed on everyone and everything in society unless people stop and make a stand. Unless something is done now, ultimately there will be *no* boundaries, *no* sense of what is right and wrong. I’ve heard it put this way – when “marriage” can be applied to anything, it will ultimately mean nothing.

The argument that homosexual unions should be celebrated and supported simply because Jesus preached “love” is a intellectually (and morally) bankrupt position, and flies in the face of God’s word.

If churches want to take that position, fine. Be a social organization – do good in the community, support the poor, etc. I have no problem with that. But if you’re going to reshape the Bible at every opportunity to suit the whims of the World, please don’t associate yourself with Christ.

Christmas in March

Views: 7

OK, so here I am with my Christmas present!

A Gibson 1967 Reissue Flying V from Sam Ash. Took them long enough to get it to me, but the other option was to pay $200 more at another store, and I’ve learned to be patient 🙂

It’s much lighter and smaller than I thought. The only other experience I’ve had with Gibson guitars are their Les Pauls which weight a ton and come with a complimentary chiropractic adjustment for when you throw your back out.

Hm… trying to think of something else to type so the photo doesn’t extend into previous posts…

Uh. It’s black (well, “ebony”), has two humbuckers, 22 frets, neck-through body, rosewood fingerboard… nah – here’s the specs straight from Gibson’s webpage:

BODY
Species: Mahogany

NECK
Species: Mahogany
Profile: Rounded
Peghead Pitch: 17�
Thickness at 1st fret: 0.800″
Thickness at 12th fret: 0.850″
Heel Length: 0.625″
Neck Joint Location: 17th fret

FINGERBOARD
Species: Rosewood
Scale length: 243/4″
Total Length: 18.062″
Nut Width: 111/16″
Width at 12th fret: 2.062″
Frets: 22
Inlays: Pearloid Dot

HARDWARE
Plating Finish: ChromeBridge: Tune-o-matic
Tailpiece: Stopbar
Knobs: In-Line Black Top Hats with inserts
Tuners: Grover Kidney

ELECTRONICS
Neck Pickup: 496R ceramic magnet humbucker
Bridge Pickup: 500T ceramic magnet humbucker
Controls: Two volume, one tone, three-way switch

TGIF

Views: 9

That about covers it.